Skip to content
AI for businessFor building ownersHow it worksPricingResearchCompany
Let’s talk
AI for businessFor building ownersHow it worksPricingResearchCompanyLet’s talk
On this pageThe workEvaluationProposal

Solutions/Engineering and product/IT services company

Coding assistance, tested on your own repositories.

Completions, chat, pull-request review and tests for delivery teams whose client contracts keep code off the public cloud, evaluated on your own repositories.

Arrange a workload evaluationSee how an evaluation works

Prefer email? hello@azitalabs.com, subject “Workload evaluation: IT services company”

Client contracts keep code off the public cloud.

Your delivery teams want coding assistants for completions, review and tests. Many client contracts restrict where source code may be processed, so teams either go without or use tools the client never approved. And each client sets its own rules, so what one project may use, the next may not.

What you bring
Your repositories, your engineers' requests and the evaluation set your teams trust.
What comes back
Completions, chat answers, pull-request review comments and generated tests, in the editor your teams already use.

What an evaluation could look like.

An example workflow

A system integrator

Engineers on a banking project cannot send client code to public coding tools. An evaluation could run the team's own evaluation set where the client contract allows and compare completion quality, review usefulness and total cost with the tools used elsewhere.

An example workflow

An outsourcing firm

Large delivery teams pay for coding assistant seats on every project. An evaluation could take one project repository, run review and test generation, and let the engineering leads compare the output and the total cost.

An example workflow

An IT services company

Code review on fixed-bid projects is a bottleneck before each release. An evaluation could run pull-request review on a sample of merged changes and set the tech leads' judgement next to the total cost.

Macro of a printed node-graph pipeline diagram on a dark desk in warm lamplight

Your evals decide.

Your evals are the bar

Every step is judged against your own evaluation set. A step that does not pass stays where it is.

Project by project

Each client's rules decide which projects take part, and the assistant is evaluated only where that client's contract allows.

Quality and total cost, compared

Coding assistance compared as one job, next to the tools your delivery teams use today, before you switch.

Where it runs, and what is agreed.

Capacity from the Azita fleet

Run your workload on capacity from Azita’s installations. Scope the workload and data requirements.

Discuss your workload on the fleet →

An installation in your building

Scope the room and workload together. Azita designs, installs and commissions the deployment.

Discuss an installation in your building →

Where the work runs, which models are used, who has access and how long anything is kept are agreed in your proposal before any work starts. The Trust page sets out custody and residency by side.

Compare quality and total cost on your own workload.

Agree a representative job and the acceptance criteria. Compare the output, turnaround, data requirements and total cost before deciding.

  1. Share one repositoryA project repository and the evaluation set your engineers trust, where the client contract allows.
  2. Agree the pass criteriaYour evaluation set, the review standards of your tech leads and where each client allows its code to go.
  3. Compare on both stacksPass rates, latency, data requirements and total cost, side by side. Cut over step by step, or not at all.

Available to evaluate on your own workload.

On the Azita fleet, or on an installation in your building.

Arrange a workload evaluation

We'll review what you need to run and contact you to discuss the right setup.

Proposal based on your workload and deployment.

There is no price list. Your proposal states what is being quoted, the commitment and what is included. Human review, software licences and integration are listed wherever they apply.

Add what you pay for today. It travels with your enquiry as a note, so the comparison starts from the same work.

Opens the spend table on the pricing page. Your note travels with your enquiry, never in the page address.

Prefer to read first? How pricing works →

Straight answers.

Is it as good as the coding tools we use now?+

Your own evaluation set decides. Your engineers compare completions, review comments and tests on your repositories, and anything that does not meet their bar stays where it is.

How does an evaluation work?+

Share one project repository and the evaluation set your engineers trust. We agree the pass criteria, run completions, review and test generation, and set out quality, latency and total cost side by side.

What changes for our engineers?+

They keep the editor they use. The assistant points at the agreed location instead of a public service, and you roll it out project by project.

Where does our client code go?+

On the Azita fleet, or on an installation in your own building. Where your client code is processed, who has access and how long anything is kept are agreed in your proposal before any work starts.

How is it priced?+

Proposal based on your workload and deployment. It states what is being quoted, the commitment and what is included, and lists human review, software licences and integration wherever they apply. There is no price list.

What happens if a client leaves?+

Term, exit and what happens to that client's code at the end are set out in your agreement before you sign.

Related

Use case

Engineering teams

From your repositories to completions, chat, pull-request review and tests in the editor your team uses.

Read →

Engineering and product

Agents, support, extraction and product features, tested on your own evals.

The page for every kind of work in this group, and how an evaluation works.

Read →

Also for

Data extraction

Parsing, classification and field extraction on right-sized models, tested on your own documents. Compare accuracy, latency and total cost first.

Read →

Start with your own workload.

Share one pipeline

A production workflow and its eval set. We agree the pass criteria, then compare output, latency and total cost on the same input.

Arrange a workload evaluation

AI factories in buildings that already have power.

Platform

  • How it works
  • RackQuilt
  • Token Mills
  • AzExchange

For buyers

  • AI for business
  • Voice agents for BFSI floors
  • Private coding pods
  • Hospitals and diagnostics
  • VFX assist for post houses
  • Promo and product clips
  • Creators
  • Agencies
  • Engineering
  • Finance
  • Healthcare & BFSI

For buildings

  • Estates
  • For building owners

Tools

  • Pricing
  • Room illustrations

Proof

  • Trust & compliance
  • Sources
  • Research

Company

  • Company
  • Team
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Investors
  • Contact
AI enquirieshello@azitalabs.comProperty enquirieshello@azitalabs.com

© 2026 Azita Labs Private Limited

PrivacyTermsHosting terms

New Delhi, India